Phind

Data-handling profile

Trains on input

Yes, on the consumer tier (enterprise tier excluded)

Retention

For consumer users, data is retained until the user deletes their account or requests deletion. For Enterprise/API users, Phind states that input data is not used to train models and is retained only as long as necessary to provide the service or as required by law.

Data region

United States

Certifications

none listed

DPA available

Yes

Breach history

None reported

EU AI Act

As a US-based AI provider, Phind is subject to the EU AI Act if they provide services to EU users; however, they do not currently publish a specific compliance statement regarding their status under the Act.

Sources

Everything above rests on a single document. That is not the same evidence as two independent documents agreeing. If the vendor moves or rewrites that page, the whole profile goes with it — treat these claims as uncorroborated and check them yourself before relying on them.

• https://www.phind.com/privacyblocks our crawler; opens in a browser
• https://www.phind.com/termslink no longer resolves
• https://www.phind.com/enterpriselink no longer resolves

Every fact above is drawn from the vendor's public documentation, reviewed by a human, and version-stamped. Monitored daily for changes. 2 of these 3 links no longer resolve. We record what we relied on rather than deleting it, so the trail stays auditable — but a struck-through source cannot be re-checked today.

Control mapping

Obligations this vendor triggers, each attributable to the fact it rests on — for your supplier register, not a compliance determination.

• EU AI Act Art. 50 — Transparency obligations for AI systemsattention

  trains_on_input = consumer_tier. Inputs may be reused for model training — users interacting with this system need to be informed accordingly.

• EU AI Act Art. 26 — Obligations of deployers of high-risk AI systemsapplies

  Applies to your organisation as deployer, independent of vendor. Assign human oversight, keep logs, and monitor operation where this tool is used in a high-risk context (Annex III duties apply from 2 Dec 2027).

• ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.19 — Information security in supplier relationshipsapplies

  Phind processes organisational data as a supplier. Include this vendor in the supplier register and risk assessment.

• ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.20 — Addressing information security within supplier agreementsok

  dpa_available = true. A data processing agreement is available and should be executed.

• ISO/IEC 27001 A.5.23 — Information security for use of cloud servicesattention

  Cloud AI service; trains_on_input = consumer_tier. Data submitted to this cloud service may be retained or reused — define acceptable-use rules for it.

• ISO/IEC 42001 A.10.3 — Suppliers of AI systems and servicesapplies

  No certifications listed. No AI-management certification identified; assurance must come from your own supplier assessment.

• GDPR Art. 44–49 — International transfers of personal dataattention

  data_region = United States. Processing occurs outside the EU/EEA — a transfer mechanism (SCCs or adequacy) must be in place.

• NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) — Supply chain securityapplies

  AI vendor forms part of your ICT supply chain. In scope for entities covered by NIS2; include in supply-chain risk measures.

• DORA Art. 28 — General principles for ICT third-party riskapplies

  AI vendor is an ICT third-party service provider. For financial entities: register of information and contractual requirements apply.

Change history

No material changes recorded since monitoring began.